Author

Alessandra Malito

Browsing

This one number will help you more accurately plan for retirement — thanks to the Secure Act.

A $100,000 or even $200,000 balance in a 401(k) plan might seem like a lofty amount of money — and it is — but it may not mean as much in your retirement as you think.

As part of the new Secure Act, plan sponsors will have to show Americans how their account balances translate into monthly income. The new retirement law, which was passed in December, aims to provide investors with a clearer picture about whether or not they’re on track to retire.

“It helps people better understand how much money they have in their 401(k),” said Noel Abkemeier, the co-chairperson of the American Academy of Actuaries’ Lifetime Income Risk Joint Committee. A balance of $100,000 for a married couple could be somewhere around $6,000 a year, he said, or $500 a month. The final monthly figure depends on a few factors, including how far off retirement is and assumed rates of return on those investments.

Seeing savings as monthly income allows investors to plan their futures better. Most Americans must draw on numerous sources of income in retirement, such as their own savings, pensions and Social Security. But just a lump sum of money, as retirement savers may often see when looking at 401(k) statements, gives them a false sense of security, said Tim Walsh, senior managing director of investing products for TIAA.

“The benefit of including an estimated monthly income is it reframes how people think about that,” Walsh said. “They think about what their monthly income will be in retirement and if it is not going to be enough, then they can make changes to get to that monthly income.”

Under the Secure Act, plan sponsors will need to deliver that monthly figure in their annual statements to investors, but the law did not specify how. Regulators have yet to clarify the guidelines for how plan sponsors will calculate that monthly number, but the goal is to give investors a reference as to where they currently stand, and where they would stand in retirement, said Abkemeier.

The Department of Labor will create assumptions plan sponsors can use to project monthly income, and the Secretary of Labor must develop a model disclosure, according to the Society for Human Resource Management, a membership association based in Alexandria, Va.

TIAA already incorporates projected monthly figures for account holders, Walsh said. The firm uses a simple annuity, because investors have said they like the idea of a pension.

The Secure Act made a few other changes to the country’s retirement system, including expanding access to annuities in 401(k) plans and creating easier paths for small businesses to band together to offer retirement plans to employees. The law also eliminated the “stretch IRA” for most Americans, which allowed inheritors of qualified accounts to withdraw over their lifetimes and delays the age for required minimum distributions.

Not all Americans are properly prepared for their futures, though retirement readiness is slowly improving. Baby boomers and millennials are mostly on track to retire with the income they need, according to Fidelity Investments’ biennial Retirement Savings Assessment. Generation X investors were the only ones who had actually fallen behind, the study found. It is important to note, Fidelity’s assessment is based on a survey the firm conducts with its own customers — not all Americans.

There are many more people who do not have access to retirement plans. States are stepping in to resolve that issue, by providing small businesses with individual retirement accounts that can be set up with automatic enrollment and contributions through payroll. Aside from lack of access, many workers, especially younger ones, say they can’t save enough for their futures because of crippling student debt, rising rents and home prices, low pr stagnant wages and exorbitant child care expenses.

Shifting the perspective from one large lump sum to monthly payments could be a key to helping Americans save more, Walsh said, especially since it is human nature to focus on the present. “It doesn’t stop and end with the statement,” he said. “What it really does is encourage people to go deeper. It is really just a starting point.”

Author: Alessandra Malito

Source: Market Watch: You may not have as much in your 401(k) for retirement as you think

Kentucky has one of the worst public pension plans in the country, but it’s just been saved from getting even worse.

The state’s Supreme Court ruled against a reform law that would have cut benefits for public employees, including teachers, law enforcement, firefighters, social workers and government workers. Under the law, workers hired between 2003 and 2008 would have to pay 1% of their salaries for retiree health insurance and future teachers would no longer have a promised benefit from retirement to death. The court ruled the law, which had been folded into a sewage services bill, had not gotten public comment or testimony, nor had the state lawmakers enough time to consider it before it was passed.

Kentucky isn’t the only state with pension woes. The funding gap between state pension system assets and benefits promised to workers nationwide hit $1.4 trillion in 2016, according to Pew Charitable Trusts, and states and municipalities are scrambling to get their plans better equipped to meet retirees’ needs. The average funded ratio in 2016 was 66%, and the total amount in liabilities (what is owed to current employees, retirees and dependents) for all of these plans was $4 trillion.

States also have to worry about market returns, which naturally affect their pensions’ investment portfolios, especially for some underfunded pension funds that may have turned to equities to make up the funding gap. The good news: an impending downturn could inspire these plans to rebalance their portfolios, which will get them allocated properly.

Here are the states’ pension plans, from most funded to least funded (the ratio of assets in proportion to total pension liability), according to Pew Charitable Trusts:

1. Wisconsin — 99%

2. South Dakota — 97%

3. Tennessee — 94%

4. New York — 91%

5. Nebraska — 89%

6. North Carolina — 88%

7. Idaho — 88%

8. Utah — 86%

9. Washington — 84%

10. Iowa — 82%

11. Delaware — 81%

12. Oregon — 81%

13. Florida — 79%

14. Maine — 77%

15. Arkansas — 77%

16. Missouri — 77%

17. Georgia — 76%

18. Wyoming — 73%

19. Texas — 73%

20. Virginia — 72%

21. Nevada — 72%

22. Ohio — 72%

23. West Virginia — 72%

24. Oklahoma — 72%

25. Montana — 71%

26. California — 69%

27. Alabama — 67%

28. North Dakota — 66%

29. New Mexico — 65%

30. Kansas — 65%

31. Maryland — 65%

32. Vermont — 64%

33. Michigan — 64%

34. Indiana — 63%

35. Alaska — 63%

36. Arizona — 60%

37. Louisiana — 60%

38. New Hampshire — 58%

39. Massachusetts — 58%

40. Mississippi — 58%

41. South Carolina — 54%

42. Rhode Island — 54%

43. Minnesota — 53%

44. Pennsylvania — 53%

45. Hawaii 51%

46. Colorado — 46%

47. Connecticut — 41%

48. Illinois — 36%

49. Kentucky — 31%

50. New Jersey — 31%

Some of the more poorly funded states have changed positions in the last five years. In 2013, Illinois was the worst funded pension plan, and Connecticut was the second-to-last.

Publication: Market Watch|The states where pensions are safe — and where they’re in trouble

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!